Restorative Justice as a Human Rights Protection Mechanism for Marginalized Groups in the Indonesian Legal System

Authors

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.46891/

Keywords:

Human Rights, Marginalized People, Restorative Justice

Abstract

Based on the mandate of the law, everyone has the same position in law or what we call it equality before the law. However, in reality this does not apply to the marginalized. Several legal cases of marginalized people do not receive protection of human rights (HAM) in completing the legal process. For this reason, the state has begun to change the pattern of legal settlement by using the concept of restorative justice with the hope that the marginalized will get justice. This paper employs a normative juridical approach and utilizes secondary data to analyze the potential of restorative justice to uphold human rights protections for marginalized groups throughout the legal process. To date, marginalized groups have not achieved optimal outcomes in legal cases, often receiving disproportionately harsh sentences and imprisonment for minor offenses. Such cases may be better addressed through restorative justice methods, which better align with the human rights of marginalized individuals. Accordingly, this article examines restorative justice as a potential solution for marginalized groups in resolving legal issues. Restorative justice prioritizes fairness for victims, offenders, and the broader community, irrespective of social status. Through this approach, marginalized groups are anticipated to be better able to safeguard their human rights during legal proceedings.

References

Huda, M. W. S., Astrovanapoe, S. U., Amalia, T., & Latifiani, D. (2023). Implementation of Law Number 16 of 2011 Concerning Legal Aid as a Form of Implementation of the Welfare Law State Concept. Ikatan Penulis Mahasiswa Hukum Indonesia Law Journal, 3(2), 166–180. https://doi.org/10.15294/ipmhi.v3i2.71410

Manullang, E., Sinaga, B. N. P. D., & Siburian, K. (2025). Protection of Human Rights in the Context of Indonesian Constitutional Law Against the Functions of State Institutions. Indonesian Journal of Law and Justice, 2(3), 1–12. https://doi.org/10.47134/ijlj.v2i3.3652

Natsif, F. A. (2024). Hukum Kejahatan HAM: Perspektif Hukum Pidana Indonesia dan Hukum Pidana Internasional. Kencana.

Purwanti, F. (2022, May 27). Ada 5 Kasus Restorative Justice di Blitar, Hanya 1 Terealisasi. detikJatim. https://www.detik.com/jatim/hukum-dan-kriminal/d-6097656/ada-5-kasus-restorative-justice-di-blitar-hanya-1-terealisasi

Satrih, S. (2021). Social Critique in Gabriel Garcia Marquez’s “One Hundred Years of Solitude.” Seshiski: Southeast Journal of Language and Literary Studies, 1(1), 75–91. https://doi.org/10.53922/seshiski.v1i1.16

Sholehuddin. (2003). Sistem Sanksi dalam Hukum Pidana: Ide Dasar Double Track System & Implementasinya. Radja Grafindo Persada.

Sitepu, B. G. (2022). Pembentukan Dewan Pertimbangan Marginal Guna Mewujudkan Regulasi Daerah yang Inklusif. Journal of Studia Legalia, 1(1), 142–163. https://doi.org/10.61084/jsl.v1i1.11

Suhardi, G. (2021, January 25). Nenek Minah Namamu Disebut. Media Indonesia. https://mediaindonesia.com/podiums/detail_podiums/2050-nenek-minah-namamu-disebut

Wahid, A., Rohadi, R., & Kusyandi, A. (2025). “No Viral No Justice” Phenomenon in Indonesian Law Enforcement: Acceleration or Threat to Justice ? Reformasi Hukum, 29(1), 36–51. https://doi.org/10.46257/jrh.v29i1.1183

Downloads

Published

2025-11-28

Issue

Section

Articles

How to Cite

Restorative Justice as a Human Rights Protection Mechanism for Marginalized Groups in the Indonesian Legal System. (2025). Kainawa: Jurnal Pembangunan Dan Budaya, 7(2), 107-120. https://doi.org/10.46891/