Dodeca-Helix
Pentingnya Mengintegrasikan 12 Dimensi Pemangku Kepentingan untuk Menumbuhkan Ekosistem Inovasi di Kota Baubau
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.46891/Kata Kunci:
Dodeca-Helix, Ekosistem Inovasi, Pemangku Kepentingan, Inovasi Daerah, Kota BaubauAbstrak
Evolusi model inovasi dalam pengembangan daerah telah berkembang dari Triple-Helix hingga model yang lebih kompleks, namun masih terdapat kesenjangan dalam mengakomodasi peran berbagai pemangku kepentingan dalam ekosistem inovasi daerah. Penelitian ini mengkaji bagaimana model Dodeca-Helix dapat mengintegrasikan 12 dimensi pemangku kepentingan untuk menumbuhkan ekosistem inovasi di Kota Baubau. Melalui pendekatan kualitatif dengan metode analisis deskriptif, penelitian dilaksanakan dalam empat tahap: studi kepustakaan, pemetaan pemangku kepentingan, pengembangan kerangka konseptual, dan validasi empiris. Pengumpulan data dilakukan melalui analisis dokumen dan regulasi terkait inovasi daerah. Hasil penelitian menunjukkan bahwa implementasi model Dodeca-Helix berkontribusi pada peningkatan status Kota Baubau dari "Kurang Inovatif" menjadi "Inovatif" dalam periode 2023-2024. Model ini terbukti efektif dalam mengorkestrasi peran spesifik dari 12 dimensi pemangku kepentingan, mulai dari akademisi hingga penerima manfaat utama. Temuan ini mengonfirmasi bahwa keberhasilan inovasi daerah membutuhkan keterlibatan aktif dari berbagai pemangku kepentingan melebihi model helix konvensional. Penelitian merekomendasikan pengembangan mekanisme koordinasi yang lebih efektif, sistem monitoring dan evaluasi yang terukur, serta penguatan kapasitas kelembagaan untuk keberlanjutan kolaborasi jangka panjang.Referensi
Agus. (2023). Stakeholders Mapping in Election Management in West Nusa Tenggara Province. Revista de Gestão Social e Ambiental, 17(7), e03618. https://doi.org/10.24857/rgsa.v17n7-014
Bason, C. (2010). Leading Public Sector Innovation: Co-creating for a Better Society. Bristol University Press. https://doi.org/10.2307/j.ctt9qgnsd
Borrás, S., & Edquist, C. (2019). Holistic Innovation Policy: Theoretical Foundations, Policy Problems, and Instrument Choices. Oxford University Press. https://doi.org/10.1093/oso/9780198809807.001.0001
Cai, Y. (2022). Neo-Triple Helix Model of Innovation Ecosystems: Integrating Triple, Quadruple and Quintuple Helix Models. Triple Helix, 9(1), 76–106. https://doi.org/10.1163/21971927-bja10029
Carayannis, E. G., & Campbell, D. F. J. (2010). Triple Helix, Quadruple Helix and Quintuple Helix and How Do Knowledge, Innovation and the Environment Relate To Each Other? : A Proposed Framework for a Trans-disciplinary Analysis of Sustainable Development and Social Ecology. International Journal of Social Ecology and Sustainable Development (IJSESD), 1(1), 41–69. https://doi.org/10.4018/jsesd.2010010105
Carayannis, E. G., & Campbell, D. F. J. (2012). Mode 3 Knowledge Production in Quadruple Helix Innovation Systems: 21st-Century Democracy, Innovation, and Entrepreneurship for Development. Springer New York. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4614-2062-0
Carayannis, E. G., Campbell, D. F. J., & Grigoroudis, E. (2021). Helix Trilogy: the Triple, Quadruple, and Quintuple Innovation Helices from a Theory, Policy, and Practice Set of Perspectives. Journal of the Knowledge Economy, 13(3), 2272–2301. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13132-021-00813-x
Carayannis, E. G., Grigoroudis, E., Campbell, D. F. J., Meissner, D., & Stamati, D. (2018). ‘Mode 3’ Universities and Academic Firms: Thinking Beyond the Box Trans-disciplinarity and Nonlinear Innovation Dynamics Within Coopetitive Entrepreneurial Ecosystems. International Journal of Technology Management, 77(1–3), 145–185. https://doi.org/10.1504/IJTM.2018.091714
Cooke, P. (2016). The Virtues of Variety in Regional Innovation Systems and Entrepreneurial Ecosystems. Journal of Open Innovation: Technology, Market, and Complexity, 2(3), 1–19. https://doi.org/10.1186/s40852-016-0036-x
Damle, M., & Krishnamoorthy, B. (2022). Knowledge Economy and Investment Decision Aided by Regional Innovation Development: A Framework. 2022 International Conference on Decision Aid Sciences and Applications, DASA 2022, 1212–1218. https://doi.org/10.1109/DASA54658.2022.9765301
de Oliveira Paula, F., & da Silva, J. F. (2019). The Role of Innovation for Leveraging Regional Development. Revista PRETEXTO, 20(1), 72–83. https://doi.org/10.21714/pretexto.v20i1.6016
Dewi, I. G. A. A. Y., & Suryana, I. N. M. (2024). Kolaborasi Triple Helix dalam Program Inovasi Desa (Studi Kasus: Desa Sanur Kaja, Kecamatan Denpasar Selatan, Kota Denpasar). Kebijakan: Jurnal Ilmu Administrasi, 15(2), 253–262. https://doi.org/10.23969/kebijakan.v15i02.13762
Egorov, N., Kovrov, G., & Solomonov, M. (2021). Assessment of Sustainable Development of the Region’s Innovation System Based on the Concept of the Triple Helix Theory. E3S Web of Conferences, 295, 01010. https://doi.org/10.1051/e3sconf/202129501010
Fajarudin, D., Setiana, N., Supriadi, U., Hidayat, Moh. T., & Nariyah, H. (2024). Collaboration of Hexahelix in Developing Natural Tourism Potential. Journal Research of Social Science, Economics, and Management, 4(2), 213–225. https://doi.org/10.59141/jrssem.v4i2.696
Farinha, L., Santos, D., Ferreira, J. J., & Ranga, M. (Ed.). (2020). Regional Helix Ecosystems and Sustainable Growth: The Interaction of Innovation, Entrepreneurship and Technology Transfer. Springer International Publishing. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-47697-7
Firmansyah, D., Suryana, A., Rifa’i, A. A., Suherman, A., & Susetyo, D. P. (2022). Hexa Helix: Kolaborasi Quadruple Helix dan Quintuple Helix Innovation Sebagai Solusi untuk Pemulihan Ekonomi Pasca COVID-19. EKUITAS: Jurnal Ekonomi dan Keuangan, 6(4), 476–499. https://doi.org/10.24034/j25485024.y2022.v6.i4.4602
Fitri, S. E., Pranasari, M. A., Indarti, D. M., Savira, E. M., Andari, T., Aprilani, T. L., Utami, K. J., Putri, N., Manoby, W. M., Putra, I. R. A. S., & Saksono, H. (2023). Illuminating Tradition Through Innovation: Transforming Traditional Woven Tourism in Smart Tourism in Central Lombok Regency. Jurnal Bina Praja, 15(1), 207–220. https://doi.org/10.21787/jbp.15.2023.207-220
Hatmaja, D., Andri, S., Heriyanto, M., Mayarni, & Safitri, S. (2024). Dynamics of Collaborative Governance of Actors in Palm Oil Fresh Fruit Bunch Price Setting. E3S Web of Conferences, 506, 03002. https://doi.org/10.1051/e3sconf/202450603002
Hossain, Md. I. (2024). Global Citizens, Civic Responsibility, and Intercultural Communication in a Rapidly Globalising Multicultural World: Community Revitalisation and Reflective Practise. Ethnopolitics, 23(5), 487–514. https://doi.org/10.1080/17449057.2023.2216982
Kalenov, O., & Shavina, E. (2018). The Role of “Triple Helix” Innovative Model in Regional Sustainable Development. E3S Web of Conferences, 41, 04054. https://doi.org/10.1051/e3sconf/20184104054
Kijek, T., Kijek, A., & Matras-Bolibok, A. (2023). Innovation and Regional Development. Dalam Innovation and Regional Technological Convergence (hlm. 5–23). Springer Science and Business Media Deutschland GmbH. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-24531-2_2
Kinnunen, T., Rinkinen, S., Majava, J., & Gillette, J. (2018). Innovative Regional Development Through Triple Helix Collaboration: A Comparative Case Study of Strategic Structures and Implementation. International Journal of Innovation and Regional Development, 8(2), 120. https://doi.org/10.1504/IJIRD.2018.092084
Lundvall, B. Å. (2010). National Systems of Innovation: Toward a Theory of Innovation and Interactive Learning. Anthem Press. https://doi.org/10.7135/UPO9781843318903
Makmur, S., Matara, K., Gartika, D., & Saksono, H. (2021). The Five F’s Innovation: A Competitive Positioning Strategy for Women’s Empowerment. Linguistica Antverpiensia, 2.
Martinidis, G., Komninos, N., & Carayannis, E. (2022). Taking Into Account the Human Factor in Regional Innovation Systems and Policies. Journal of the Knowledge Economy, 13(2), 849–879. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13132-021-00722-z
McAdam, M., & Debackere, K. (2018). Beyond ‘Triple Helix’ Toward ‘Quadruple Helix’ Models in Regional Innovation Systems: Implications for Theory and Practice. R&D Management, 48(1), 3–6. https://doi.org/10.1111/radm.12309
Meijer, A., & Bolívar, M. P. R. (2015). Governing the Smart City: A Review of the Literature on Smart Urban Governance. International Review of Administrative Sciences, 82(2), 392–408. https://doi.org/10.1177/0020852314564308
Miller, R. (2019, Mei 24). The Post-digital Era: Getting Ready for What Comes Next. Accenture. https://insuranceblog.accenture.com/the-post-digital-era-getting-ready-for-what-comes-next
Mulyaningsih, H. D. (2015). Enhancing Innovation in Quadruple Helix Perspective: The Case of the Business Incubators in Indonesia. International Business Management, 9(4), 367–371. https://doi.org/10.3923/IBM.2015.367.371
Naumova, E. A., & Sokolova, E. V. (2022). Regional Aspects of the Application of the «Triple Helix» Model as a Factor in the Development of an Innovative Economy. Entrepreneur’s Guide, 15(4), 45–51. https://doi.org/10.24182/2073-9885-2022-15-4-45-51
Park, H. W. (2014). Transition from the Triple Helix to N-Tuple Helices? An interview with Elias G. Carayannis and David F. J. Campbell. Scientometrics, 99(1), 203–207. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11192-013-1124-3
Perkmann, M., & Walsh, K. (2007). University–Industry Relationships and Open Innovation: Towards a Research Agenda. International Journal of Management Reviews, 9(4), 259–280. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1468-2370.2007.00225.x
Praswati, A. N. (2017). Perkembangan Model Helix dalam Peningkatan Inovasi. Prosiding Seminar Nasional Riset Manajemen & Bisnis 2017 “Perkembangan Konsep dan Riset E-Business di Indonesia, 690–705. http://hdl.handle.net/11617/9022
Prokhorenkov, P. A., & Reger, T. V. (2022). Innovations as a Factor of Regional Development. Fundamental Research, 12, 75–80. https://doi.org/10.17513/fr.43400
Reshetnyak, O., & Lobodin, R. (2020). Clusters in Innovation: Triple Helix, Quadruple Helix and Quintuple Helix Models. Odessa National University Herald Economy, 25(6(85)). https://doi.org/10.32782/2304-0920/6-85-13
Saksono, H. (2020). Innovation Hub: Media Kolaborasi Menuju Pemerintahan Daerah Inovatif. Nakhoda: Jurnal Ilmu Pemerintahan, 19(1), 1–16. https://doi.org/10.35967/JIPN.V19I1.7854
Saksono, H., Humalanggi, M., Lantapon, N., & Butolo, I. (2023). The Role of Economic Intelligence in Accelerating Welfare of Gorontalo Province. Jurnal Bina Praja, 15(3), 543–556. https://doi.org/10.21787/jbp.15.2023.543-556
Sufandy, S. (2024). Analysis of Hexa Helix Actors in the Development of the Lejja Hot Springs Natural Tourism Park, South Sulawesi Province. Proceedings of the International Conference on Multidisciplinary Science (INTISARI), 1(1), 129–140. https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.12735667
Sumarto, R. H., Sumartono, Muluk, M. R. K., & Nuh, M. (2020). Penta-Helix and Quintuple-Helix in the Management of Tourism Villages in Yogyakarta City. Australasian Accounting, Business and Finance Journal, 14(1), 46–57. https://doi.org/10.14453/aabfj.v14i1.5
Tadung, E. (2023). Opportunities and Challenges of Pentahelix Collaboration for Poverty Alleviation in Indonesia: A Systematic Literature Review. KnE Social Sciences, 8(17), 289–303. https://doi.org/10.18502/kss.v8i17.14122
Vani, R. V., Zulyani, E. P., Saputra, D., & Ikhsan, M. (2024). The Revolution of Helix Theory: Transforming Public Policy. Jurnal Administrasi Politik dan Sosial, 5(1), 59–76. https://doi.org/10.46730/japs.v5i1.131
Yusri, M., Cemda, A. R., & Siregar, S. (2022). Empowering Regional Development with Quadruple Helix Creative Industry Model. Journal of Urban Development and Management, 1(1), 17–25. https://doi.org/10.56578/judm010103
Unduhan
Diterbitkan
Terbitan
Bagian
Lisensi
Hak Cipta (c) 2024 Penulis
Artikel ini berlisensiCreative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
